The court examined whether tax paid during investigation can be treated as voluntary. It ruled that authorities must investigate coercion claims before treating such payments as voluntary.
The issue was whether delayed appeal against GST demand could still be filed. The court allowed the assessee to file appeal with delay condonation and directed consideration as per law.
The issue was whether delayed appeal against GST demand could be entertained. The court allowed filing of appeal with delay condonation and directed authorities to consider it as per law.
The issue was whether delayed appeal against GST order can still be entertained. The court allowed filing of appeal with delay condonation and directed the authority to consider it sympathetically.
The issue was whether delayed appeal against GST demand could be entertained. The court allowed filing of appeal with delay condonation and directed authorities to consider it sympathetically.
The Court held that GSTIN cannot be cancelled solely based on supplier irregularities without examining the taxpayer’s transactions. The matter was remanded due to absence of independent findings.
The Court held that input tax credit cannot be restricted to the month of invoice when business practices require later accounting. It ruled that such restriction defeats the objective of avoiding cascading taxation.
The Court held that input tax credit claimed on invoices from non-existent dealers justified penalty under VAT law. It reaffirmed that the burden of proof lies on the assessee and cannot shift to the Revenue.
The Court set aside a show cause notice that combined several financial years into one proceeding. It held that each assessment year must be treated separately under Section 73 of the CGST Act.
The Court held that each financial year creates a separate cause of action, making a consolidated notice legally unsustainable. It quashed the notice and allowed fresh year-wise proceedings.
