The Himachal Pradesh High Court set aside a GST order involving alleged wrongful ITC availment of over ₹17.67 crore because the adjudicating authority failed to consider an audit report relied upon by the petitioner.
The Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to file a fresh application for revocation of cancelled GST registration after earlier rejection for non-filing of reply. The authority was directed to consider the request after granting an opportunity of hearing.
The Telangana High Court set aside the rejection of a GST revocation application that was dismissed for failure to reply within the stipulated time. The Court directed the authority to provide another opportunity to submit a response and decide the matter afresh.
The Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to file a physical application for revocation of cancelled GST registration after the GST portal blocked delayed online filing.
The Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to file a physical application for revocation of cancelled GST registration after the GST portal blocked delayed online filing.
The Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to submit a physical application for revocation of cancelled GST registration after the GST portal blocked delayed online filing. The authority was directed to consider and decide the application within three weeks.
The Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to file a physical application for revocation of cancelled GST registration after the GST portal blocked online filing due to limitation.
The Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to submit a manual application for revocation of cancelled GST registration after the GST portal did not allow online filing due to limitation issues.
The Telangana High Court quashed GST refund rejection orders after finding that the authority failed to consider detailed replies filed by the taxpayer. The Court directed fresh adjudication after granting a rehearing opportunity.
The High Court held that documents received through official international channels carry presumption of genuineness but must still satisfy proof requirements under Section 78 of the Indian Evidence Act.
