Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : Overview of Form STK-2 under Section 248(2), covering eligibility, ineligible companies, documents, process, filing fee and ROC pr...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for redemption of preference shares under Section 55, including CRR, ROC filings, statutory registers and f...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for altering the Object Clause under Section 13, filing Form MGT-14, and SEBI LODR compliance for listed co...
Company Law : Article explains the provisions governing appointment of proxies under Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 19 of the C...
Company Law : Legal Provision and Obligations for a company with respect to Securities issues by Private Placement This Article outlines the leg...
Company Law : ICSI will provide CSEET June 2026 evaluated answer books through its portal from 16 July 2026 without RTI, subject to prescribed t...
Company Law : ICSI declared the CSEET June 2026 results on 15 July 2026. The pass percentage is 67.59%, and e-Result-cum-Marks Statements are av...
Company Law : MCA has cautioned stakeholders against phishing calls, WhatsApp messages, emails, fake websites, and ZIP attachments impersonating...
Company Law : ICSI has urged PESB to recognize Company Secretaries as eligible for Board-level and Functional Director positions in CPSEs. The r...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the Government to amend the law to allow Company Secretaries in Practice to appear before DRTs and DRATs. It argues...
Company Law : NCLAT set aside directions to hand over two properties to the RP, holding Civil Court-recognised possessory rights could not be di...
Company Law : NCLAT dismissed the IRP's appeal, upheld ₹3 lakh remuneration and held reliance on K. Sashidhar was distinguishable in the fee d...
Company Law : Companies and individuals prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under the Companies Act, 2013 were not entit...
Company Law : NCLT Mumbai sanctioned a composite scheme under Sections 230–232 and 66 after finding statutory compliance and no objections fro...
Company Law : NCLT Chennai sanctioned the amalgamation scheme after statutory compliance, undertakings on regulatory observations, and absence o...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of Section 92(4) non-compliance within 30 days after examining defective MCA filings relating t...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of Section 137(1) non-compliance within 30 days and recorded zero penalty under the proviso to ...
Company Law : ROC Delhi II imposed maximum penalties under Section 117(2) for five delayed MGT-14 filings and directed rectification within 90 d...
Company Law : ROC Gwalior imposed penalty under Section 203(5) after holding simultaneous appointment of the same person as CFO and Whole-Time D...
Company Law : ROC Gwalior imposed penalty under Section 124(7) after finding non-compliance with IEPF-2 filing requirements under Section 125(2)...
NCLAT held that the order appointing the Resolution Professional under Section 97 was obtained on the basis of misrepresented and non-existent jurisdictional facts relating to the alleged personal guarantee. Accordingly, the impugned order was set aside as void ab initio.
NCLAT held that challenges to the approved resolution plan could not be reopened after earlier proceedings had attained finality. The appeal was dismissed as an attempt to re-agitate settled issues.
The Tribunal admitted insolvency proceedings after finding documentary evidence of operational debt, part payment, ledger confirmation, and admission of liability by the Corporate Debtor. The absence of any pre-existing dispute was a key factor.
Section 7 insolvency application filed by State Bank of India (SBI) was admitted against Martina Bio Genics Private Limited and held that pending winding-up proceedings could not override the objective of corporate revival under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).
he analysis clarifies that accumulated losses do not prevent a company from issuing bonus shares from its Securities Premium Account. Eligibility depends on compliance with Section 63 conditions and absence of financial or statutory defaults.
NCLAT held that dismissal for want of prosecution was unjustified where multiple adjournments were caused by the Tribunal due to paucity of time and technical issues. The ruling emphasizes that litigants should not be penalized when delays are not entirely attributable to them.
The 2025 amendment replaces annual DIR-3 KYC compliance with a filing requirement once every three consecutive financial years. Directors must now track their cycle based on the year their DIN was allotted and file by 30 June of the relevant year.
The 2025 amendment replaces annual DIR-3 KYC filings with a triennial compliance framework. Directors now need to file KYC once every three financial years while continuing to report changes in particulars within prescribed timelines.
The MCA has replaced annual DIR-3 KYC filings with a once-in-three-years framework. Most DIN holders who complied in FY 2025-26 are exempt from filing in FY 2026-27.
The article explains that stamp duty on securities is calculated based on consideration under the amended Indian Stamp Act. Since gifts involve no consideration, transfer of shares by way of gift attracts no stamp duty, though Form SH-4 remains mandatory.
