Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : Overview of Form STK-2 under Section 248(2), covering eligibility, ineligible companies, documents, process, filing fee and ROC pr...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for redemption of preference shares under Section 55, including CRR, ROC filings, statutory registers and f...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for altering the Object Clause under Section 13, filing Form MGT-14, and SEBI LODR compliance for listed co...
Company Law : Article explains the provisions governing appointment of proxies under Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 19 of the C...
Company Law : Legal Provision and Obligations for a company with respect to Securities issues by Private Placement This Article outlines the leg...
Company Law : ICSI will provide CSEET June 2026 evaluated answer books through its portal from 16 July 2026 without RTI, subject to prescribed t...
Company Law : ICSI declared the CSEET June 2026 results on 15 July 2026. The pass percentage is 67.59%, and e-Result-cum-Marks Statements are av...
Company Law : MCA has cautioned stakeholders against phishing calls, WhatsApp messages, emails, fake websites, and ZIP attachments impersonating...
Company Law : ICSI has urged PESB to recognize Company Secretaries as eligible for Board-level and Functional Director positions in CPSEs. The r...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the Government to amend the law to allow Company Secretaries in Practice to appear before DRTs and DRATs. It argues...
Company Law : NCLAT set aside directions to hand over two properties to the RP, holding Civil Court-recognised possessory rights could not be di...
Company Law : NCLAT dismissed the IRP's appeal, upheld ₹3 lakh remuneration and held reliance on K. Sashidhar was distinguishable in the fee d...
Company Law : Companies and individuals prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under the Companies Act, 2013 were not entit...
Company Law : NCLT Mumbai sanctioned a composite scheme under Sections 230–232 and 66 after finding statutory compliance and no objections fro...
Company Law : NCLT Chennai sanctioned the amalgamation scheme after statutory compliance, undertakings on regulatory observations, and absence o...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of Section 92(4) non-compliance within 30 days after examining defective MCA filings relating t...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of Section 137(1) non-compliance within 30 days and recorded zero penalty under the proviso to ...
Company Law : ROC Delhi II imposed maximum penalties under Section 117(2) for five delayed MGT-14 filings and directed rectification within 90 d...
Company Law : ROC Gwalior imposed penalty under Section 203(5) after holding simultaneous appointment of the same person as CFO and Whole-Time D...
Company Law : ROC Gwalior imposed penalty under Section 124(7) after finding non-compliance with IEPF-2 filing requirements under Section 125(2)...
Where a composite scheme of arrangement satisfies the procedural requirements of sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the requisite stakeholder consents are available, the Tribunal may dispense with meetings of the concerned classes, direct compliance with statutory notice requirements and permit the scheme to proceed to the second motion stage for final sanction.
The article explains the most common DPT-3 classification errors that can expose companies and directors to penalties under the Companies Act. It also highlights the extended filing deadline and reporting requirements.
Form DPT-3 is an annual MCA compliance requirement for reporting deposits and specified non-deposit receipts. The article explains applicability, due dates, filing requirements, and penalties for non-compliance.
The document clarifies that a director’s resignation becomes effective upon receipt by the company or the specified future date, without requiring Board approval. It also explains the statutory compliances and continuing liabilities after resignation.
NCLAT held that the appellant failed to prove the alleged deposit was made to the respondent company, as the records showed the money was credited to the Kerala Trade Centre. The appeal was dismissed with liberty to pursue remedies against the appropriate entity.
NCLT Mumbai compounded the offence for failure to hold the AGM within the time prescribed under Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal directed payment of a compounding fee after finding a continuing statutory default.
NCLT Mumbai dispensed with meetings of shareholders and certain creditors after noting that the transferor company was a wholly owned subsidiary of the transferee company. The Tribunal held that no shares were required to be issued under the proposed amalgamation.
The NCLT Ahmedabad refused to condone a 4,215-day delay in filing an appeal for restoration of a struck-off company. The Tribunal held that the delay was not satisfactorily explained and the alleged subsisting bank charge no longer existed, leaving no sufficient cause for condonation.
The NCLT Mumbai held that participation and voting in the first creditors’ meeting did not amount to relinquishment of a secured creditor’s security interest. It ruled that the bank remained entitled to enforce its security under the SARFAESI Act.
The NCLT Bengaluru directed the bank to hand over the original title deeds after finding that the successful resolution applicant had paid the entire amount under the approved resolution plan. It held that pending litigation over interest did not justify withholding the documents.
