Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : Overview of Form STK-2 under Section 248(2), covering eligibility, ineligible companies, documents, process, filing fee and ROC pr...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for redemption of preference shares under Section 55, including CRR, ROC filings, statutory registers and f...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for altering the Object Clause under Section 13, filing Form MGT-14, and SEBI LODR compliance for listed co...
Company Law : Article explains the provisions governing appointment of proxies under Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 19 of the C...
Company Law : Legal Provision and Obligations for a company with respect to Securities issues by Private Placement This Article outlines the leg...
Company Law : ICSI will provide CSEET June 2026 evaluated answer books through its portal from 16 July 2026 without RTI, subject to prescribed t...
Company Law : ICSI declared the CSEET June 2026 results on 15 July 2026. The pass percentage is 67.59%, and e-Result-cum-Marks Statements are av...
Company Law : MCA has cautioned stakeholders against phishing calls, WhatsApp messages, emails, fake websites, and ZIP attachments impersonating...
Company Law : ICSI has urged PESB to recognize Company Secretaries as eligible for Board-level and Functional Director positions in CPSEs. The r...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the Government to amend the law to allow Company Secretaries in Practice to appear before DRTs and DRATs. It argues...
Company Law : NCLAT set aside directions to hand over two properties to the RP, holding Civil Court-recognised possessory rights could not be di...
Company Law : NCLAT dismissed the IRP's appeal, upheld ₹3 lakh remuneration and held reliance on K. Sashidhar was distinguishable in the fee d...
Company Law : Companies and individuals prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under the Companies Act, 2013 were not entit...
Company Law : NCLT Mumbai sanctioned a composite scheme under Sections 230–232 and 66 after finding statutory compliance and no objections fro...
Company Law : NCLT Chennai sanctioned the amalgamation scheme after statutory compliance, undertakings on regulatory observations, and absence o...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of MGT-7 filing relating to CFS disclosures under Section 450, with zero penalty recorded in th...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of defective Section 92(4) filings within 30 days and recorded nil penalty under its adjudicati...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of Section 137(1) AOC-4 filing defects within 30 days and recorded nil penalty in its adjudicat...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of AOC-4 for non-selection of the CFS option under Section 137(1); penalty table records zero p...
Company Law : ROC Delhi I directed rectification of AOC-4 for non-selection of the CFS option under Section 137(1); penalty table records zero p...
The NCLT Delhi dispensed with meetings of secured and unsecured creditors after finding that the proposed demerger involved no compromise with creditors and did not adversely affect their rights. Only the resulting company’s equity shareholders were directed to convene a meeting.
The NCLT allowed the first motion application for a demerger scheme and dispensed with meetings of the Resulting Company’s equity shareholders and unsecured creditors because all had provided consent affidavits. It directed meetings only for the Demerged Company’s stakeholders and laid down the procedure for further approval.
The Tribunal found the amalgamation application maintainable and noted compliance with valuation, accounting standards, board approvals, and disclosure requirements. It allowed the first motion application while directing further statutory compliances before sanction of the Scheme.
The NCLT held that the mere existence of an arbitration clause in a Shareholders’ Agreement does not automatically require disputes to be referred to arbitration. The Tribunal refused reference where the dispute involved statutory remedies under the Companies Act.
The NCLT refused to dispense with the transferee company’s shareholders’ meeting, holding that shareholders should evaluate the implications of the recent acquisition and proposed amalgamation despite the subsidiary being wholly owned.
The NCLT approved the takeover of minority shareholding after finding that all procedural and statutory requirements under the Companies Act had been complied with. The Tribunal held that the Scheme was fair, reasonable, and legally compliant.
ICSI has requested the MCA to grant compliance relaxations following technical disruptions caused by the Data Centre fire. The proposed reliefs include filing extensions, protection from penalties, and operational support for affected stakeholders.
The Tribunal held that its wide powers under Sections 241-242 and Rule 11 cannot override the mandatory conditions prescribed under Section 55 for redemption of preference shares. The ruling confirms that equitable jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass statutory safeguards.
The article explains how shares devolve upon nominees or legal heirs without a transfer deed or consideration. It highlights the legal framework, procedures, and documentation requirements under the Companies Act, 2013.
The issue concerned the maintainability of a class action petition under the Companies Act. The SC, acting on the parties’ consent, referred the disputes to arbitration and set aside the NCLT and NCLAT orders while leaving all issues open.
