Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : MCA has split Delhi’s ROC into South and Central jurisdictions effective 16 February 2026. Companies must verify their district ...
Company Law : Company registration gives a business separate legal identity and limited liability protection. It is essential to operate legally...
Company Law : The 2025 amendment broadens eligibility under Section 233, allowing more small, start-up, and unlisted companies to use the Region...
Company Law : The One Person Company structure offers separate legal identity and limited liability under the Companies Act, 2013. It allows sin...
Company Law : The Companies Act prescribes detailed procedures for appointing first and subsequent auditors, including tenure limits and mandato...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the government to set up an NCLT Bench in Pune citing 30,600 pending cases and prolonged insolvency timelines. The ...
Company Law : With insolvency cases taking up to 853 days against the 330-day mandate, concerns over NCLT backlog have intensified. A new bench ...
Company Law : The upgraded MCA21 V3 portal processed over 3.84 crore filings in five years and resolved 98% of helpdesk grievances in FY 2025-26...
Company Law : The Government clarified that decade-long data does not show a consistent upward trend in non-compliance. While penalties have inc...
Company Law : The Government clarified how regulatory powers and red-flag indicators are used to tackle shell and dormant companies misused for ...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that termination of contract not triggered by the insolvency of Corporate Debtor and therefore not barred by mora...
Company Law : The Tribunal ruled that adopting stamp duty value without obtaining a DVO report violates Section 50C when the assessee disputes f...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that the threshold criteria is applicable at the time of filing Section 7 application under Insolvency and Bankru...
Company Law : The appellate tribunal upheld rejection of a tax claim submitted long after the liquidation deadline. The ruling reiterates that b...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that repeated application under section 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for taking refuge of moratorium ...
Company Law : The Registrar penalized the officer in default for failing to appoint the required number of independent directors within the pres...
Company Law : The order held that signing financial statements during disqualification violated Section 134(1). The key takeaway is that such no...
Company Law : The order held that failure to file DIR-12 within 30 days of resignation violated Section 170(2). The key takeaway is that adminis...
Company Law : The Registrar imposed a penalty for failure to appoint the required two independent directors within the prescribed three-month pe...
Company Law : The ROC Chhattisgarh held that repeated return of official letters marked Not Known proved non-compliance with Section 12(1) of th...
In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 642 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and all other powers hereunto enabling, the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms, 1956.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 621 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and in supersession of the Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs (Department of Company Affairs) notification number G. S. R. 69 (E) dated the 15th February, 1995,
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 530 of the Companies Act, 1956 ( I of 1956) the Central Government hereby notifies that the sum to which priority shall be given under clause (b) of sub section (1) of section 530 of the said Act with effect from 1st day of March, 1997 shall not in case of any one claimant, exceed the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only.
You may be aware that the Department of Company Affairs have recently issued revised annual cost audit orders for the financial year ending 31.3.1994 and continuously thereafter to all those companies which were previously subjected to cost audit for every alternate financial years. A list containing the names of these companies is being sent separately to the Secretary of your Institute.
It has been brought to the notice of this Department that many of the companies for which maintenance of books of accounts have been made mandatory under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and Cost Accounting Records Rules prescribed, have failed to keep such books of accounts in the manner indicated thereunder
One of the tests of what constitutes ‘oppression’ within the meaning of Section 397 of the Act is to see whether the majority is taking an unfair advantage of their position as a majority. The second test is to find out whether in the exercise of the fiduciary power, the group concerned was attempting to destroy the existing majority or to create a new majority which did not exist previously.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of sectio,i 620 of the Companies Act. 1956 ( I of 1956). the Central Government hereby directs that the provisions of clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 17 of the said Act read with the Companies.
directed to refer to your letter no. PD/69/90 dated 19.2.90 on the subject mentioned above and to say that the cost auditor shall be deemed to have concluded his appointment as soon as he renders a report to the Central Government in accordance with the Cost Audit Report Rules. The specified number of companies for the purpose of section 23 3B (2) of the Act
directed to refer to your letter no. CLC/79/89 dated 8th January, 1990 on the subject mentioned above and to say that while giving a certificate in terms of provision to sub-section 224 of the Companies Act, 1956, the auditor or auditors will not take into account the actual appointments as auditors in the companies but also their proposed appointment in companies for which they have given their consent.
After a careful examination of the statement made by the cost auditors, the Department is of the view that it would be more appropriate if while mentioning the figures for previous year, the Cost Auditor certifies the position by means of note that figures so stated are on the basis of information furnished by the management, for which he has obtained a certificate from them.
