Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Uday Uttamrao Nevase Vs Assessing Officer/Assessment Unit (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Uday Uttamrao Nevase Vs Assessing Officer/Assessment Unit (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune Upholds 200% Sec 270A Penalty – Wrong Chapter-VI-A Claims Treated as Misreporting; No Immunity u/s 270AA In Uday Uttamrao Nevase vs AO (AY 2022-23), the ITAT Pune dismissed the assessee’s appeal and confirmed penalty levied u/s 270A for misreporting of income. The assessee, a salaried individual, had claimed multiple deductions under Chapter-VI-A — including u/s 80DD, 80CCD(2), 80DDB, 80E, 80EEA, 80EEB and 80GGC — aggregating to ₹10.65 lakh without supporting evidence, which were later admitted to be inco...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031