This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Contract Termination not triggered by insolvency is not barred by moratorium u/s. 14 of IBC: NCLAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pradeep Upadhyay Vs Bhadohi Industrial Development Authority (BIDA) (NCLAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Pradeep Upadhyay Vs Bhadohi Industrial Development Authority (BIDA) (NCLAT Delhi)
NCLAT Delhi held that termination of contract not triggered by the insolvency of Corporate Debtor and therefore not barred by moratorium under section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC]. Accordingly, appeal held as devoid of merit.
Facts- The present Appeal has been filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) against the impugned order dated 06.06.2025 of Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal. The Appellant seeks to set aside or modify the order dated June 6, ...






