The case involved cancellation of GST registration and delay in filing appeal due to illness. The Court held that writ jurisdiction can override limitation where sufficient cause is shown and restored the appeal for decision on merits.
The issue involved recovery despite statutory pre-deposit under GST law. The Court held that once pre-deposit is made, further recovery must stop and excess amounts should be refunded.
The case involved denial of input tax credit solely due to return mismatch without examining records. The Court held that such mechanical reliance is invalid and ordered fresh adjudication.
The case involved cancellation of GST registration due to non-response to a notice. The Court allowed restoration subject to filing returns and payment of tax, penalty, and interest.
The Court examined inclusion in a rowdy register without supporting material and found no criminal cases or evidence. It held that such listing is unlawful without tangible proof and ordered deletion of the entry.
The case involved denial of GST refund due to unclear documentation on shipping details. The Court held that the assessee must be given a chance to submit proper evidence and ordered fresh adjudication.
The issue involved denial of access to seized documents relied upon in a GST notice. The Court held that taxpayers must be given inspection and copies of relied documents before responding.
The Court clarified that local self-government bodies are not automatically exempt from GST on all activities. It ruled that such claims require factual scrutiny and cannot bypass the statutory appellate mechanism.
The Supreme Court held that the IBC cannot be used as a substitute for execution of a civil court decree. It ruled that initiating CIRP for recovery purposes amounts to misuse of the insolvency framework.
The case examined reassessment based on third-party information without independent application of mind. The Tribunal ruled that reliance on borrowed satisfaction invalidated the addition, leading to its deletion.
