The case examined whether delayed filing of Form 10/10B invalidates exemption under section 11(2). The Tribunal held that procedural delays do not defeat substantive claims, directing allowance of exemption.
The case addressed whether omission of Rule 96(10) affects ongoing disputes over IGST refunds. The Court held that the omission applies to pending proceedings, allowing refund claims to proceed.
The ruling held that vouchers are not goods or services and cannot be taxed as supply. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, limiting GST liability to commission income where applicable.
The Court held that an SCN uploaded in the Additional Notices Tab without effective visibility denied the assessee a fair hearing, leading to the quashing of the demand order.
The tribunal held that disallowance of weighted R&D deduction is unsustainable when valid Form 3CM approval is on record. It emphasized that sufficient documentary evidence before the AO supports the taxpayer’s claim.
The case addressed whether cancellation for non-filing of returns could be reversed. The court allowed revocation subject to filing returns and payment of tax, interest, and penalty.
The case examined whether taxpayer funds used for security could be challenged through a PIL. The court dismissed the plea, holding that it lacked genuine public interest and was based on insufficient material.
The issue was whether restricted classification of sugar disqualified exporters from incentives. The Court ruled that conditional restrictions allowing permitted exports do not negate RoDTEP eligibility.
The Tribunal upheld deletion of additions as the AO failed to provide evidence or conduct independent verification. The ruling highlights the need for substantiated findings in reassessment cases.
The Tribunal remitted the matter to the AO after finding that the allowance of expenses was based on unverified claims of evidence submission. It directed fresh verification and adjudication.
