The Tribunal held that challenges to appreciation of evidence amount to review, not rectification. It ruled that Section 254(2) permits only correction of apparent errors, leading to dismissal of the Revenue’s application.
The Tribunal held that long-term capital gains cannot be disallowed solely on investigation reports and assumptions. It found that documentary evidence and investment history supported genuineness, leading to deletion of additions under Section 68.
The case involved denial of GST refund without following mandatory procedure under Rule 92(3). The Court held that absence of notice and hearing invalidates the rejection and ordered fresh consideration.
The case involved refusal to entertain a delayed GST appeal due to limitation. The Court followed its earlier ruling and directed authorities to hear the appeal on merits subject to statutory deposits.
The case involved delay in filing GST appeal due to death of a key partner managing operations. The Court held that such circumstances constitute sufficient cause and directed the appeal to be heard on merits after statutory compliance.
The case involved cancellation of GST registration and delay in filing appeal due to illness. The Court held that writ jurisdiction can override limitation where sufficient cause is shown and restored the appeal for decision on merits.
The issue involved recovery despite statutory pre-deposit under GST law. The Court held that once pre-deposit is made, further recovery must stop and excess amounts should be refunded.
The case involved denial of input tax credit solely due to return mismatch without examining records. The Court held that such mechanical reliance is invalid and ordered fresh adjudication.
The case involved cancellation of GST registration due to non-response to a notice. The Court allowed restoration subject to filing returns and payment of tax, penalty, and interest.
The Court examined inclusion in a rowdy register without supporting material and found no criminal cases or evidence. It held that such listing is unlawful without tangible proof and ordered deletion of the entry.
