Explore the recent ITAT Delhi decision (Amit Tyagi vs DCIT) highlighting that the non-production of directors doesnt justify addition for advancing loans. Assessee’s documentary evidence, PANs, and banking transactions were deemed valid. Get insights into the arguments, observations, and legal perspective.
ACIT Vs Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank (ITAT Indore) Provision for Standard Assets Allowable under Section 36(1)(viia) of Income Tax Act, 1961
ACIT Vs. Armee Infotech (ITAT Ahmedabad) RASHTRIYA KOMI EKTA PARTY IS ONE OF THE ‘23’REGISTERED UNRECOGNISED POLITICAL PARTIES. The grievance of the Revenue in its appeal for the Asstt.Year 2012-13 is that the ld.CIT(A) has erred in deleting disallowance of Rs.55 lakhs in respect of donation to political parties under section 80GGC of the Act. […]
High Court held that Income Tax Faceless assessment order under section 143(3) rws 144B becomes invalid if Assessment is completed without following standard operating procedure (SOP).
Decision of jurisdictional high court with jurisdiction over AO should be followed and applied by NFAC. Relief should not be refused to taxpayer merely because there was a conflicting decision of a non-jurisdictional high court.
Income Tax e-Portal has added a new feature that allows taxpayers to respond to any ITBA notice/document DIN that is not linked to a PAN/TAN or Notice under Section 133(6) where the user does not have an e-filing account with the entity to which the notice is issued.
n this case addition was made u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D by AO and confirmed by CIT (A) holding that Amendment in Finance Act, 2022 in relation to disallowance u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D is applicable retrospectively even if no exempted income was earned by assessee.
Keenara Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) HC held that substituted provisions of sections 147 to 151 shall be applicable w.e.f. 01.04.2021, and as per First Proviso to Section 149, limitation as specified under unamended provision as it stood prior to 01.04.2021, shall be applicable. As per unamended provision prescribing limitation, no notice can […]
Keenara Industries Private Limited Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) In the case of Keenara Industries Private Limited Vs ITO and other 256 cases Gujarat High Court set aside Notices under section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and impugned orders under section 148A(d) on the ground of limitation. FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT HIGH […]
If foundational allegation is missing in notice issued under Section 148A(b), the same cannot be incorporated by issuing a supplementary notice.
