Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules. 2022 – WEF July 1, 2022, additional fees on form will be increased to 18 times from existing 12 times of normal fees. However, these excludes Annual Filings which are charged at Rs. 100 per day without any upper limit. Government of India MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS Notification […]
Considering the fact that the impugned order has been passed without issuance of a show cause notice and mandatory draft assessment order, the impugned order passed by the first respondent cannot be sustained.
Pioneer Carbide Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Meghalaya High Court) The present matter is governed by Rule 117 of the CGST Rules of 2017. Thus, on plain reading of the Rule, a registered person who has submitted a declaration electronically in the relevant form is entitled to revise the declaration and file it afresh […]
SLV Housing Development Corporation Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The tax authorities have pointed out time gap in getting a tax audit report from a new CA. However, it is a known fact that it might have taken some time to severe relationship with the earlier CA. However, the fact remains that the tax audit report […]
In re Utsav Corporation (GST AAAR Rajasthan) It was held that controller will attract GST at appropriate rate applicable to items of Chapter Heading 8504. 2. Iron structure designed for use of solar panel is classifiable under Chapter Heading 7308 and neither be classified as solar power based devices nor called as solar power generators […]
We form an opinion that the order is bad in law. This we say so, for two reasons- (a) violation of principles of natural justice, i.e. Fair opportunity of hearing. No sufficient time was afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order passed ex parte in nature, does not assign any sufficient reasons even decipherable from the record, as to how the officer could determine the amount due and payable by the assessee. The order, ex parte in nature, passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, entails civil consequences.
Commissioner of Customs Vs B. Dhananjayan (CESTAT Chennai) For violation of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations the agent is not an inspector, but rather a processing agent of documents with respect to clearance of goods through Customs House; that the mentioning of IE Code of the exporter in the shipping bill would itself reflect that before […]
Vinayak K Deshpande Vs Nexo Industries P Ltd (NCLAT Chennai) In view of the fact that the Settlement Agreement has been entered into between the parties and based on the said Agreement, the subject matter is issue is resolved between the parties, as informed by the Learned Counsels appearing for the parties, this ‘Tribunal’, dismisses […]
All Private Offices shall be closed, except those which are falling under the ‘Exempted Category as prescribed in DDMA’s GRAP Order No. 460 dated 08.08.2021. The practice of work from home shall be followed.
ACIT Vs Armee Infotech (ITAT Ahmedabad) In the case of Gujarat Ambuja (supra), the AO disallowed 25% of the bogus purchase, which has been reduced to 5% at the level of ITAT. This decision of the ITAT was challenged before the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court, the Hon’ble Court did not interfere in the finding of […]
