Mr. Maity is handling 13 assignments, which are ongoing. It has been mentioned in the press release, that the CBI has arrested Mr. Maity regarding demand for undue advantage of Rs.20,00,000/-.
In re Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GST AAAR Gujarat) The appellant Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation submitted that they provide amenities like road, supply of water or electricity, street lighting, drainage, sewerage, conservancy etc and these qualify as ‘water supply for domestic, industrial and commercial purposes’, ‘public health, sanitation conservancy and solid waste management’ and ‘public […]
In our considered view the presumption cannot be real adjudication of an issue. The very purpose of income tax proceedings is to correctly assess the tax liability of an Assessee in accordance with law but not under presumption as held in this case.
There is no prohibition for the NRI for accepting the gifts from the relatives. In the absence of any prohibition, no adverse inference can be drawn against the assessee based on the prevailing system in the society.
Stella Maris Church Malpe Vs ITO (Exemptions) (ITAT Bangalore) We notice that the date of hearing of the appeal i.e. 23.12.2021 was announced on the earlier occasion on 6.11.2021. On that day, the counsel of the assessee Smt. K. Soumya, Advocate has taken note of the date of hearing and hence there was no necessity […]
Suzuki Suiting Pvt. Ltd. Vs I.T.O (ITAT Ahmedabad) Admittedly, the difference in the price of the share issued by the assessee and its fair market value and calculated and certified by the C.A. is barely 1% of its total value. The difference being Rs. 2.81 against the share value of Rs. 200/-, it is meager […]
United Spirits Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Taxes (CESTAT Bangalore) CESTAT find that the adjudicating authority has confirmed the demand in respect of various fees paid to the State Government in respect of manufacture, import and sale of alcoholic liquor. The adjudicating authority, though dropped the demand on licence fee, but confirmed the demand on […]
Lokhandwala Construction Industries Private Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court) In this case, during the original assessment proceedings, a notice dated 19th October 2019 was issued under Section 142(1) of the Act by which petitioner was called upon to furnish copies of Index II(s) of three flats sold during the year. Petitioner responded by its […]
Infosys Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) This stay petition is filed by the assessee seeking extension of stay granted by the Tribunal in SP No.83/Bang/2021 dated 29.10.2021 against the outstanding demand of Rs.1029,20,96,950 for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. The ld. AR submitted that the extension of stay was earlier granted by the Tribunal in […]
Canara Housing Development Company Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT held that advances given for purchase of land in the normal course of business of carrying on real estate development, if not recoverable could be allowed as either trading loss u/s 28 of the Act or as expenditure u/s 37 of the Act. In fact, the […]
