DCIT Vs Indranil Sanjaybhai Rajyaguru (ITAT Rjakot) It is an undisputed fact that when the initial payment of Rs. 12.15 crores has been made for purchase of the new asset that too more than the amount of capital gain to the tune of Rs. 2.90 crores before the due date of filing of the return […]
Duomatic Principle can be briefly stated as ‘anything the members of a company can do by formal resolution in a general meeting, they can also do informally, if all of them assent to it.
ESPN Digital Media (India) Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) ITAT held that the consideration paid by ESPN India for purchase of advertisement space was not taxable during the period under consideration. The consideration paid by ESPN India is not for ‘use’ of equipment (server) or for any process nor imparting of any information concerning […]
A surge in use of data wiper malware by nation sponsored threat actors is being reported. The Primary motive of the attacker for using these malware is the destruction of the victim machine/ data.
A password represents a shared secret between the end user and the system they are authenticating. The system cannot differentiate the real user from another user who also knows the password. Thus, it is essential that users keep their password private. Stolen, weak or reused passwords are prominent reasons for data breaches worldwide.
ACIT Vs Tamil Nadu Water Investment Co. Ltd. (ITAT Chennai) It is an undisputed fact that consequent to the CDR scheme, the assessee had written off the receivables from M/s. NTADCL as bad debt and the debt has become bad only due to corporate restructuring scheme. Moreover, in the books of account of M/s. NTADCL […]
Submission of petitioners that proceeding for offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC is not maintainable once the complainant invokes Section 138 of NI Act is unacceptable.
Registrar of Companies in Rajasthan fines M/s EMBASSY INFRATECH INDIA LIMITED and its directors for violating Section 119 of Companies Act, 2013 by not maintaining meeting records due to non-existence of registered office
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) Brief facts are that the appellant had imported certain goods under Advance Authorization Scheme vide various licenses. As the Advance Authorization expired, the appellants were unable to fulfill their export obligation as stipulated in these licenses. They have paid appropriate duty and interest on the quantity […]
Gujan Builder Vs Designated Committee (Madras High Court) In this case The SVLDRS 4 was not issued by the Designated Committee at that point of time. Since there is no provision to manually process it now, your request to issue discharge certificate cannot be acceded to. Moreover, the only situation where manual processing is possible […]
