Rise Projects Private Limited Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Petitioner states that impugned order dated 15th July, 2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act has been passed without considering the detailed reply filed by the petitioner. Learned senior standing counsel for the respondents-revenue, accepts notice. He, on instructions, states that as the petitioner’s contentions have […]
Subhra Jyoti Bharali Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Gauhati High Court) Section 173 of the CrPC does not prescribe piecemeal investigation and filing of incomplete charge sheet before the court. Section 173(8) CrPC prescribes that even after filing of charge sheet further investigation can be done. In that case, if the investigating officer gathers additional evidence, […]
It is not in dispute that the said electricity is supplied to the factory of the respondent and the same is used for manufacturing activity. Merely because the wind generation plant is situated far away from the manufacturing activity, credit cannot be denied.
Kerala High Court held that if petitioner complies with provision of Section 129 (1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017, there is no reason for Assistant State Tax Officer to refuse the release of the goods and the conveyance, pending finalisation of the proceedings issued under Section 129.
In absence of details regarding rental receipt from property, explanation of assessee is that cash deposits into bank account is out of rental income, cannot be accepted
Seeking of comments / feedback on the XBRL being introduced for submission of Announcements pertaining to: One time settlement (OTS)/Inter-Creditors Agreement, Agreements which are binding and not in normal course of business, revision(s) or amendment(s) and termination(s) thereof, Fraud / Defaults by promoter or key managerial personnel or by the listed entity or arrest of key managerial personnel or promoter
It is well settled that no one should be condemned unheard. Therefore, principle of natural justice should be given due consideration while adjudicating the tax dispute.
Amount deposited has no specific colour since the amount was deposited under protest and even before the crystallisation of the liability of the respondent-assessee as Central Excise Duty or as interest
ACIT Vs Amit Tiwari (ITAT Indore) The submissions of the assessee are that penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB as initiated is bad in law on account of firstly penalty notice so issued is defective as it does not disclose specific charge and secondly there is no concealed income as search took place prior to due date […]
Aurum Pharmachem Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) Issue that has to be considered in the present appeal is whether the Appellant not having maintained separate accounts in respect of the common input services used for manufacture of dutiable final products as well as exempted goods is mandatorily required to pay […]
