Seeks to further amend notification No. 55/2022-Customs, dated the 31st October 2022, in order to notify Nepalgunj road as an additional LCS against condition number 1 Vide Notification No. 31/2023-Customs Dated: 20th April, 2023 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) Notification No. 31/2023-Customs | Dated: 20th April, 2023 G.S.R.309(E). – In exercise […]
Section 148 notice is quashed solely on the ground that the impugned notice was issued in the name of non-existing company
Dispose of representation of petitioner in accordance with law and by passing a reasoned and speaking after giving opportunity of hearing.
Addition made on the basis of information and material collected on the back of the assessee cannot be tackled as valid basis for making addition
This is not a case where the petitioner has approached this writ court immediately after getting notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act or after passing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act
Illegal demand raised by GST department. Petitioner has a remedy to approach GSTAT, but till date GSTAT not been constituted.
Petitioner prays for relief of granting installment in payment of revenue dues in question under the relevant provisions of GST Act
Tax Authorities have fallen in error in holding that assessee required to pay TDS @10% towards common area maintenance charges.
HC held that ITAT was justified in deletion of addition in respect of provision for dam maintenance for five dams being RHEP, Rangali, BHEP, Balimela, UKHPE, Barinut, HPS, Burla and UIHEP, Mukhiguda
Neelam Nitin Sankhe Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) The only reason for making addition of Rs.27.00 lacs in Assessment Year 2013-14 and Rs.5.00 lacs in Assessment Year 2014-15 is that the name of assessee appeared in some document found during the search action in the case of Ameya Group(supra). There is nothing on record to further […]
