S. Ramamirtham Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) It is an admitted fact that the original assessment has been completed u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 20.03.2014. It is also an admitted fact that notice u/s. 148 of the Act dated 13.09.2017 is beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Thus, proviso to […]
Cancellation of C Forms at a subsequent date would have a disruptive effect on the stream of commercial transactions, which is impermissible.
Benefit of CVD exemption under Notification No.30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004 cannot be denied if condition is such that it is practically impossible to satisfy condition.
ARS International Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a holder of Customs Broker license issued by Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin and is also transacting business at Bengaluru, Chennai, Mumbai and New Delhi. As per the investigation report dated 23.7.2020, a specific intelligence was received by […]
Interest from staff welfare fund, interest income from staff loan, charges for closing flexi account and fine against non-payment of R/D amount due in time are eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i).
Undisputedly, invoking the provisions of section 56(2)(viia) of the Act, the Assessing Officer has treated the difference between the sale price and FMV of the shares of the assessee as income of the assessee.
Issue involved in this case is valuation of waste/bye-product and the applicability of cum-duty price for the goods cleared. There is no dispute regarding liability of Central Excise duty.
The name of Maharatta Chamber of Commerce & Industries, enlisted under Appendix 2E of FTP 2023, has been amended as `Mahratta Chamber of Commerce Industries and Agriculture’ and branch offices, address and contact details have been updated.
The appellants had to undertake the transportation of tractors from premises of Punjab Tractors Ltd to their dealers and in the bargain they may appoint drivers for the work. Appellants were required to take all responsibilities on the way.
Advancing reasons for non-payment of service tax even though collected, it has been submitted by the appellant that during the relevant period, they were under severe financial crisis. In my view, this cannot be a reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax even though collected from the customers but not deposited with the Government.
