Ghasiram Gokulchand Vs C.C. Jamnagar (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In the instant case, CESTAT find that the genuineness of the MoA dated 22.11.2012 has not been doubted. It is also noted that the LDT mentioned in the MoA dated 05.11.2012 between Ace Exim Pvt. Ltd. and Alang Auto & Gen. Engg. Pvt. Ltd. was not found to […]
Ketan Sahebrao Purkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The issue involved in the present appeal is whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant is liable to deduct tax at source u/s 194H in respect of expenditure claimed to have been debited to Profit & Loss Account under head “commission”. Without delving into […]
Ghatkesar Farmers Service Cooperative Society Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT held that assessee being a primary agricultural co-operative society invested the own surplus funds with the Union Bank of India and, therefore, the assessee is entitled to claim the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. It could be seen from the name of […]
Provision of Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act does not make any distinction in regard to source of the investment because this Section envisages deduction in respect of any income derived by co-operative society from any investment with a co-operative society.
As the Aluminium Composite Panel/Sheet attribute most of its characteristics to the two aluminium sheets from which it is made, the ACP has to be classified under the tariff heading 7606 as per Rule 3(b) of the General Rules for the interpretation of the Customs Import Tariff Schedule read with Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June,2017.
Appellant erects a warehouse using prefabricates structures. The overlying structure along with the land on which it erected constitutes the warehouse. The warehouse is meant for storage activity and therefore is associated with the beneficial enjoyment of the land on which it is constructed.
Learn about the penalty imposed by the MCA on a CFO for violating company law by holding office in more than one company. Detailed analysis and implications provided.
Andhra Pradesh GST Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has ruled on the applicability of GST on the export of pre-packaged and labelled rice.
Dinesh Sitaram Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) We note that, while culminating the reassessment proceeding in the case of the assessee, the Ld. AO vide concluding para placed at page 4 of his order communicated the assessee his action of initiating the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of Act for ‘under reporting / mis-reporting’ of income […]
In re Pagaria Infotech Ventures LLP (CAAR Mumbai) M/s. Pagaria Infotech Ventures LLP (hereinafter referred to as ‘the applicant’, in short) filed an application for advance ruling before the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, Mumbai (CAAR, in short). The said application was received in the secretariat of the CAAR, Mumbai on 26.12.2022, along with its […]
