Notification No. 29/2023-Central Excise Dated: 1st September, 2023 to further amend No. 04/2022-Central Excise, dated the 30th June, 2022, to increase the Special Additional Excise Duty on export of Diesel. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) Notification No. 29/2023-Central Excise |Dated: 1st September, 2023 G.S.R. ….(E). – In exercise of the powers conferred […]
Notification No. 76/2023-Income Tax Dated: 1st September, 2023 under section 10 sub section 46 of Income tax Act 1961 in case of Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) Notification No. 76/2023-Income Tax | Dated: 1st September, 2023 S.O. 3865(E).—In exercise of […]
Notification No. 75/2023-Income Tax Dated: 1st September, 2023 under section 10 sub section 46 of Income tax Act 1961 in case of E-Governance Society, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Himachal Pradesh Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) (Central Board of Direct Taxes) New Delhi Notification No. 75/2023-Income Tax Dated: 1st September, 2023 […]
In terms of the rules governing the award, the nomination/proposals for the said medal are to be subjected to two-tier screening. The first level of screening shall be done by the committee constituted in this regard by the Head of the Organization/ Department sponsoring the proposals (i.e. CBIC) which shall then send its recommendations to the designated Committee in MHA.
A detailed analysis of the Bombay High Court’s verdict in Mathuradas Narandas & Sons Forwarders Ltd. vs. CBDT, highlighting the significance of timely ITR filing.
Participate in DGFT’s monthly workshops for cross-border E-Commerce exports, covering logistics, customs, payments, and more. Experienced exporters can share insights as guest speakers.
Explore scope of judicial review in IBC as defined by Supreme Court. Learn how Adjudicating Authority’s role is limited to specific parameters, avoiding interference with commercial decisions.
Analysis of ITAT Chennai’s decision on taxing share premium: ACIT Vs Luncar Finance Pvt. Ltd. A focus on already taxed income in the hands of Investor Company
ITAT Chennai restores the matter of Salma Ahmed’s capital gain deduction under section 54F to CIT(E) due to inadequate details provision by the assessee.
Swar Maya Infotech’s treatment of rental and facility management income is evaluated by ITAT Delhi, emphasizing on consistency and accurate deduction claims.
