The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that that due to technical fault of the State Web-site E-way bill-02 could not be generated on 25.3.2018 before the movement of the goods from Varanasi to Fatehpur, however, the same was generated on 26.3.2018 in the morning which was much before the date of seizure order which has been admittedly passed on 27.3.2018 at 6 p.m.
The Madras High Court recently ruled that payment of Interest by the co-operative society to its members would not attract tax deduction at source (TDS) prior to the amendment of such provision.
Whether educational courses offered by the Applicant which have been approved by National Skill Development Corporation would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC?
To designate the deputy commissioners as the Appellate Authority for the purpose of MGST Act vide notification No. No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 dated: 5th June 2018.
The above two appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order dated 30.04.2005 passed by CIT(A)-41, New Delhi confirming the order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 201 (1) and 201 (1A) of the I. T. Act for the A.Y. 2011-12.
These Regulations shall apply to export of goods by any person, holding a valid Import-Export Code issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade, in furtherance of business from any foreign post office notified under sub-section (e) of section 7 of the Customs Act, 1962
DCIT Vs M/s Dynamic Transmission Limited (ITAT Delhi) With regard to addition of Rs. 63,66,574/- on account of job work charges u/s. 80IC of the I.T. Act, 1961 is concerned, we note that the AO has observed that deduction u/s. 80IC is available only in respect of articles or things manufactured by itself in its […]
Visvesvaraya Technological University Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee has moved an application for registration under section 12A on 25.05.1999, but this application was not disposed of by the CIT and it was kept pending and assessee was persuaded by the Revenue to file another application for registration. Vide letter dated 2 1.01.2002, the assessee has also […]
Shri Ashok Kumar Aggarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) AO repudiates the return filed u/s 1 58BC (a) of the Act and proceeds to make an enquiry, he has to necessarily follow the provisions of section 142, 143(2) and 143(3) of the Act. In the case before us, the Department has not been able to negate […]
Keeping in view the difficulties faced by the exporters/importers in obtaining digital signatures for making miscellaneous payment digitally/online, the requirement of DSC for exporters/importers to make digital/online payment through e-MPS has been done away with.