In re M/s. Ernakulam Medical Centre Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Kerala) i) Supply of medicines and allied items provided by a hospital through pharmacy to in-patients is part of composite supply of health care treatment and hence not separately taxable. ii) Supply of medicines and allied items provided by hospital through pharmacy to out-patients is […]
No E-Way Bill is required to be generated for Intra-city movement movement of all goods of any value in Gujarat wef 01.10.2018. Further No E-Way Bill is required to be generated for Intra-state movement of Hank, Yarn, Fabric and Garments of any value transported for the purpose of job work wef 01.10.2018.
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (2) and clause (c) of sub-rule (3), where rupees 25,000 deposited as security deposit under the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 16 has not been refunded, then in such case the application for refund may be made on or before 31st March 2019 and the provisions of clause(a) and clause (b) of sub-rule (3) shall be applicable for such cases.
Amendment to SEBI (Credit Rating Agencies) Regulations, 1999 and modification to SEBI Circular dated May 30, 2018. A. Securities and Exchange Board of India (Credit Rating Agencies) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2018
E-way bill is not required for intra-city movement of goods in Gujarat. Further for intra-State movement of goods for Job Work e-way bill is not required for transportation of Hank, Yarn, Fabric and Garments. NOTIFICATION By the Commissioner of State Tax Gujarat State, Ahmedabad Dated the 19th September, 2018. (Under section 68 of the Gujarat Goods […]
FAQs on GST ITC-03 Q.1 What is Form GST ITC-03? Ans: Form GST ITC-03 is to be filled up by those taxpayers who opts for composition scheme or where goods or services or both supplied by taxpayer becomes wholly exempt. This form is to be filed by taxpayers, to pay an amount, by way of […]
NCLAT Delhi affirms penalty on Ambuja Cements and others for anti-competitive practices. Detailed order upheld, cease-and-desist directive issued.
Bhagavan Das Dhananjaya Das Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) (a) When the New Act 2013 came into effect from 1.4.2014, the second respondent herein has wrongly given retrospective effect and erroneously disqualified the petitioner-directors from 1.11.2016 itself before the deadline commenced wrongly fixing the first financial year from 1.4.2013 to 31.3.2014. (b) By virtue of the […]
Parliament did not seek to disturb and / or affect cases where deduction is taken twice over i.e. under Section 80IA and 80HHC of the Act on the same profit, provided it was less than the gross total income as defined in Section 80IB(5) of the Act.
Employee do not have knowledge or reason to belief that goods are liable to confiscation under Section 111 of Customs Act, 1962, the penalty is not imposable on employee.
