Rajesh Ramchandra Kidile Vs Maharashtra State Information (Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench) Perusal of this application shows that the salary slips for the period mentioned in the application have been sought for by the Advocate. As rightly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the salary slips contain such details as deductions made from […]
Young Indian Vs ADIT (ITAT Delhi) It is the submission of the ld. counsel for the assessee that the provisions of section 131(1) and provisions of section 131(1A) are different and since the provisions of section 272A(1)(c) prescribe levy of penalty for non-compliance to provisions of section 131(1) only and since there is no provision […]
M/s. R.K. Cylinders Vs Commissioner Of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) Going by the activity undertaken by the appellants as per the tender agreement, it is seen that he is not covered under (i) as above. Moreover, he is not a manufacturer of cylinders or he is not any person authorized by a manufacturer. It is […]
As per section 10B for an undertaking to be eligible as 100% Export Oriented Undertaking, it should fulfill the following conditions: i) The undertaking must have approved by the Development Commissioner ii) The approval so granted by the Development Commissioner should be subsequently ratified by the Board of Approval for Export Oriented Unit (EOU) Scheme.
Hindustan Aeronaurics Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore) It is evident by the submissions of the appellant that the impugned part is not only a mere sting or wire or rope but is part of A90B100 which consists of other units. It was not correct on the part of the department to isolate a minor part […]
UB Ostan (India) Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) It is clearly evident that an appeal u/s 253 to the Tribunal is required to be filed in prescribed Form No. 36 and the same is to be signed by the persons specified in Sub-rule (2) of Rule 45. As per Sub-rule (2) of Rule 45, […]
Joy Beauty Care (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Ld. CIT(A) had accepted that the gains on sale of shares through Portfolio Management Services (PMS) providers to be taxed under the head capital gains. Against these findings of the Ld. CIT(A), the revenue has not preferred the appeal before us as per the material available […]
CIT Vs Pooja Agarwal (Rajasthan High Court) One of the main reasons for not accepting the genuineness of the transactions declared by the appellant that at the time of survey the appellant in his statement denied having made any transactions in shares. However, subsequently the facts came on record that the appellant had transacted not […]
A. Transparency in TER- In order to bring transparency in expenses, reduce portfolio churning and misselling in mutual fund (MF) schemes, the following shall be adhered to:
XLHealth Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. Vs UOI (Karnataka High Court) The total callous, negligent and disrespectful behaviour shown by the Departmental authorities in this Court should not be tolerated at all. It is this kind of lack of judicial discipline which if it goes unpunished, will lead to more litigation and chaos and such public […]
