Follow Us:

Ex-parte order cannot be recalled if in-person notice was served to CA of appellant

November 11, 2019 6711 Views 0 comment Print

Pr. CIT (Central) Vs NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court) 1. The present Application has been filed for Re­call of the Judgment dated 05.03.2019 passed by this Court in C.A. No. 2463 of 2019, on the ground that the Applicant – Company was not served with the Notice of the SLP at the […]

HC on Failure to file TRAN 1 due to technical errors or technical glitches

November 11, 2019 2475 Views 0 comment Print

Uninav Developers Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India And Ors (Delhi High Court) It was held that the entire GST system is still in a trial and error phase and it will be too much of a burden to place on the assessees to expect them to comply with the requirement of law where they […]

Service tax not payable on mere collection of event fees for organisers

November 11, 2019 1044 Views 0 comment Print

The appellant does not offer ‘convention services’ but gets events organised by professionals and, by collecting fees which are transmitted to such organisers, enables its members to participate in them. There is no allegation that any part of the fees charged by convention organisers is retained by the appellant. Thus, the activity is beyond the purview of taxability under section 65 (105) (zc) of Finance Act, 1994.

Mere Providing of Floodlighting connected to a grid not amounts to transmission & distribution of electricity

November 11, 2019 573 Views 0 comment Print

Vishwanath Projects Limited Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) Evidently, from a bare perusal of the contract, it is evident that the purpose of the contract is for providing floodlighting along the Indo Bangladesh Border in the State of Tripura and NOT for transmission and distribution of electricity. Merely because electricity is used in […]

Fusible interlining cloth classifiable under Heading 5903: AAR West Bengal

November 11, 2019 1713 Views 0 comment Print

The Applicant’s product, namely fusible interlining cloth, is classifiable under Heading 5903 in Chapter 59 of the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Supply of goods through PDS is not exempt: AAR West Bengal

November 11, 2019 2118 Views 0 comment Print

Supply of goods through PDS is not exempt under Notification No. 2/2017 – CT (Rate) dated 28/06/2017, as amended from time to time (reference to which includes reference to State Notification No. 1126 – FT dated 28/06/2017) or any other notification. Activities or transactions of the Applicant are not included in Schedule III either. The Applicant is, therefore, liable to pay GST at the applicable rate on his supplies of goods through PDS.

Empanelment of officers for promotion to Principal CIT grade for Year 2019

November 11, 2019 2124 Views 0 comment Print

Empanelment of the following officers for promotion to the grade of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCIT) in the Indian Revenue Service (Income Tax) in Level 16 in the Pay Matrix (Rs.205400-224400/-) for the panel years 2018 (Supplementary Panel) and 2019 (Regular Panel), w.e.f. the date of assumption of the charge of the post and until further orders:

Notification No. 44/2019-Customs (ADD), Dated: 11.11.2019

November 11, 2019 2973 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 44/2019-Customs (ADD)– Seeks to amend notification No. 1/2017-Customs dated 5th January, 2017 to insert S. Nos. 48 to 52 in the duty table to finalize the assessment of exports of jute products by M/s. Roman Jute Mills Ltd. (Producer/Exporter) and M/s SMP International, LLC, USA (Exporter/ Trader), M/s Aziz Fibres Limited (Producer/Exporter), M/s […]

NBFC- Peer to Peer Lending Platform (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2017

November 9, 2019 3555 Views 1 comment Print

(1) These Directions shall be known as the Non-Banking Financial Company – Peer to Peer Lending Platform (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2017. (2) These Directions shall come into force with immediate effect.

No addition for Cash Short found at premises: HC

November 9, 2019 6984 Views 0 comment Print

As to the addition made of Rs.37,30,710/-, which is lesser cash in hand as compared with the books of accounts in which the assess has shown more cash in hand, the Tribunal held that it is neither a case under Section 68 of the IT Act nor Section 69-A of the Income Tax Act.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031