The ITAT Delhi dismissed the revenue’s appeal against D&Y Technologies, confirming that the Assessing Officer cannot reject a company’s books of account based solely on a decline in profit rates or disallow director’s salary without evidence that the payment was not for business purposes.
The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd., holding that a further Section 14A disallowance is unwarranted when the assessee’s own disallowance exceeds the exempt income.
The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of Nilesh Shirish Mehta, setting aside a reassessment order for AY 2015-16. The tribunal found the Section 148 notice, issued after April 1, 2021, to be time-barred and invalid based on concessions made by the Department before the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal.
The Delhi High Court set aside the entire reassessment process against Siam Stock Holdings Ltd. after finding that all official notices were sent to a former employee’s email address, violating principles of natural justice and rendering the proceedings invalid.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, confirming the deletion of additions made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
Tribunal held that once a scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) allows a claim, any earlier disallowance by CPC under Section 143(1) merges into it and loses force.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has deleted a ₹55 lakh addition made under the “accommodation entry” theory, ruling that the repayment of loans through banking channels negated any benefit to the assessee, thereby making the addition and the reassessment legally unsustainable.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Nagpur condoned a 729-day delay in Rupa Abhay Vyas’s appeal, citing the death of her legal counsel during the COVID-19 pandemic and her subsequent medical diagnosis.
Tribunal held that technical issues in filing Form 56F cannot bar deduction under Section 10AA. Meghmani LLP’s Rs. 4.82 crore claim allowed as form submission was directory, not mandatory.
In a case concerning a real estate transaction, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad, held that an assessment under Section 153C was invalid as no incriminating material was found from the assessee.
