The ITAT Hyderabad held that section 144C cannot override outer time limits under section 153. Assessments passed beyond statutory deadlines are void, reinforcing strict compliance with limitation periods.
Tribunal held that commission could not be treated as bogus where the recipient company’s existence was established through income tax returns, refunds, and official records, leading to deletion of the disallowance.
ITAT Pune ruled that Section 5A overrides Rule 37BA, granting full TDS credit of ₹45.28 lakh to a Goa resident whose wife did not claim her share, rejecting CPC’s proportionate restriction
Rakesh Kumar Pandey Vs ACIT (ITAT Lucknow) 7% Is Reasonable, 11% Is Wishful: ITAT Reins in Profit Estimation in Contractor’s Case- When Books Are Estimated, Disallowances Die: ITAT’s Clean Sweep in Search Assessment- Search Confession Can’t Rewrite Past: ITAT Caps NP at 7% & Deletes Pre-Search Additions Issue 1: Estimation of Net Profit after Search […]
ITAT Kolkata dismissed Rs. 6.52 crore addition under section 68, holding that cash deposits were substantiated by audited books and AO failed to reject accounts or prove them unexplained.
The CIT(Exemption) canceled 80G approval as the trust did not submit audit reports, expenditure proof, and bank statements. The tribunal remitted the case for fresh consideration with opportunity to comply.
ITAT remanded penalty proceedings to CIT(A) as the underlying quantum of income addition is pending adjudication, directing fresh consideration post-quantum decision.
The Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication after the assessee was wrongly credited with company income due to erroneous PAN and 26AS entries, emphasizing fair play over technical delay.
The Tribunal condoned a 152-day delay in filing appeals, emphasizing that the delay was unintentional and did not benefit the appellant. This reinforces the justice-oriented approach in tax appeal filings.
The Tribunal deleted Rs. 26.73 lakhs added under Section 69A, holding that the deposit was from agricultural income and prior withdrawals. Revenue failed to disprove the assessee’s explanation, confirming that farmers’ cash deposits need proper evaluation.
