The assessee has received Rs. 2,54,24,007/- as interest on enhanced compensation from HUDA after the compulsory acquisition of the agriculture land of the assessee, on which TDS @10% was also deducted.
Even after the submission CIT (A) ignored the fact and upheld the addition amounting to Rs. 32,00,000/- not at Rs. 18,50,000/- which was result of rectification order passed by the AO.
In a recent ruling Delhi HC remanded the proceedings to the AO to consider the Assessee’s alternate claim for loss arising out of the HTM securities, as loss under the head ‘income from business and profession.
In a recent ruling Delhi HC remanded the proceedings to the AO to consider the Assessee’s alternate claim for loss arising out of the HTM securities, as loss under the head ‘income from business and profession.
The Surat Bench of ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purpose which means that ITAT uphold the decision of CIT (A) but without any real impact on the case. It allowed TDS credit of the of Rs.4,50,000/- but in AY 2018-19 whereas it was claimed in AY 2016-17.
In a recent ruling, the Delhi bench (NCLAT) while dismissing the appeal of the bank have held that Once the CIRP was initiated, the amount lying in the “No Lien Account”, is an asset of the Corporate Debtor if OTS did not materialize.
In a recent ruling Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that the right to maintenance is equivalent to the right to livelihood, being a subset of the right to dignity and a dignified life, which in turn flows from Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
A search and seizure operation u/s. 132 was carried out in the case of assessee by the Investigation Wing, New Delhi on 03.05.2018. The cases of some persons were also covered during search on assessee.
In a recent ruling ITAT Delhi partly allowed the appeal of the assessee and modified the order passed by the AO is modified to restrict the unaccounted income by applying 0.3% of the total credits received during the year.
Bombay HC ruled GST authorities can’t be blamed for no GST RFD 03 if SCN issued but restored the refund application, imposing ₹2L cost for non-compliance.
