Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Mentioning wrong PAN number of deceased person, is not a curable defect: ITAT Delhi

Case Law Details

Case Name
Veena Rani Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement
Veena Rani Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee being an individual filed his return of income FOR AY 2018-19 declaring income of Rs. 21,60,670/- which was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act. The assessee has received Rs. 2,54,24,007/- as interest on enhanced compensation from HUDA after the compulsory acquisition of the agriculture land of the assessee, on which TDS @10% was also deducted. In the return of income in Schedule EI, the assessee has claimed interest income of Rs. 2,54,24,007/- as exempt. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *