Whether Service tax levy is sustainable in respect of discounts/incentives received by the Advertising agency from the print/broadcast media in respect of advertisements placed by the said agencies on behalf of customers
Roshan R Jaiswal (the Appellant) is a distributor for BSNL Prepaid Cellular services etc., and was registered with Service Tax Department under the category of ‘Franchise service’. Pursuant to issue of Show Cause Notice dated October 16, 2008, which was adjudicated vide Order-in-Original
Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.(the Appellant) filed shipping bills for re-export of various machineries (impugned goods) imported for exploration purposes and claimed Drawback of the duty paid at the time of import.
AD Refund cannot be denied when no endorsement to the effect that ‘No Cenvat credit of SAD is admissible’ is made on an invoice issued to the non-registered buyer as no credit is available to the buyer on account of non-registration
n exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary
Cummins Diesel Sales & Services India Limited (the Appellant) is a manufacturer of the dutiable final products. In this respect, the Appellant had procured certain goods from Amul Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Amul) on payment of duty and availed the Cenvat credit on the same.
Sadguru Construction Co. (the Petitioner)is a partnership firm engaged in the business of construction. On March 8, 2013, preventive officers of the Service Tax Department conducted inquiry at the premises of the Petitioner regarding unpaid Service tax dues.
Antony Garages Pvt. Ltd. (the Assessee) was engaged in manufacturing of body building of buses, trucks etc. and also undertook repair, maintenance and servicing of commercial vehicles. Tata Motors Ltd. (TML) sent vehicles, after manufacturing, to the Assessee under a works order
Jai Corporation Ltd. (the Appellant) is engaged in the manufacture of synthetic blended/spun yarn falling under Chapter sub heading 55095100 and 55092100 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
The present appeal has been preferred by the Revenue before the Hon’ble CESTAT, Ahmadabad in terms of the Review Order No.R-02/2008, dated January 08, 2007 (the Review Order)signed by the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise
