the manufacturer shall produce a certificate from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare at the time of clearance of the said Goods to the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise to the effect that the said goods are required
The Central Government vide Notification No. 45/2014–Customs (ADD) dated November 21, 2014 (Notification No. 45) has again imposed Anti Dumping Duty (ADD) on import of Digital Versatile Discs-Recordable (DVD-R and DVD-RW) falling under Heading 8523 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (the Customs Tariff Act), originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong and Chinese Taipei.
the matter of review of anti-dumping duty on import of the subject goods, originating in or exported from the subject country, the designated authority in its final findings
Authorities to take expeditious steps to sanction the refund keeping in mind that interest is to be paid from the kitty of the general public – Order marked to the Finance Minister for consideration Vodafone (I) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-I [2014-TIOL-2263-CESTAT-MUM] In the instant case, the Stay application filed by the Revenue against […]
CBEC clarification regarding availment of Cenvat credit on Inputs/ Input Services after six months Background: The CBEC vide Notification No. 21/2014-CE (NT), dated July 11, 2014 (Applicable w.e.f September 1, 2014) [Notification No. 21], has amended Rule 4(1) and Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (the Credit Rules) to fix a time limit […]
On a careful and conjoint reading of the Drawback Rules, it is found that there is no prohibition set out in the Drawback Rules, which debars an exporter from seeking determination of the Brand Rate of drawback under Rule 7 of the Drawback Rules, merely because at the time of export, he had already claimed the All Industry Rate of drawback under Rule 3 thereof. In fact, the Drawback Rules seem to suggest otherwise.
It has been made explicit that where the claim for Duty Drawback is filed with reference to the rate in the AIR Schedule, an application for fixation of Brand Rate under Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 shall not be
Emitec Emission Control Tech. (I) Pvt. Ltd. (the Appellant) imported certain goods from Emitec Gesellschaft Fur Emissions technologie GmBH (EGM Germany) which is the parent company of the Appellant.
Chowgule & Company Pvt. Ltd (the Appellant) are the traders who, imported goods by discharging Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD)under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and subsequently domestically sold such goods on payment of CST/VAT
The tariff items and descriptions of goods in the said Schedule are aligned with the tariff items and descriptions of goods in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) at the four-digit level only.
