Gupta Steel Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Jamnagar – Supreme Court held that price was genuinely revised & gets reduced by amending the MOA and there was nothing wrong on the part of the Appellant to declare the price in the BOE.
Challenger Computers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes (Delhi High Court) In terms of the Section 51(a) of the DVAT Act, the selling dealer will issue the credit note to the buying dealer where the sales are subsequently reduced.
Zylog Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes- Where the smart cards are prepared in terms of an agreement with the customer by embedding requisite information, which couldn’t be sold in open market
The Department denied the Cenvat credit to Reliance Industries Ltd. (the Appellant) on the ground that the Service tax paid on the life insurance/ medi-claim policy for the existing employees and retired employees is ineligible as they are not covered under the definition
India Housing (the Appellant), a service provider, took Cenvat credit on certain input services. The Department denied the Cenvat credit on the ground that the Appellant has taken Cenvat credit on the documents which are not the correct documents as per the Rule 9(2) of the Credit Rules.
In the instant case, Raj Shipping (the Petitioner) was engaged in Bunker Supplies which mainly consisted of supply of High Speed Diesel Oil (HSD) to various incoming and outgoing vessels within or beyond the port limits of Mumbai port.
Mapra Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and others (the Petitioners) were engaged in manufacture and sale of medicines and had been regularly filing returns to the concerned Authorities. The Petitioners were claiming an exemption in respect of free of cost supply of medicines to its dealer under a scheme
If this were to be accepted, it would cause unimaginable distortion in interpreting the Valuation Law. Hence, confirming demand merely on the basis of quotation, without considering other facts is not sustainable.
Same Engines India Pvt. Ltd. (the Respondent) had imported components of Tractors from Foreign party and filed Bill of Entry stating the price at which the goods were imported and seeking to pay the Customs duty thereon.
Nirma Ltd. & Ors. (the Respondent) was engaged in the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB) which was cleared by the Respondent to its sister units located in different places and was also used captively in the same factory where the said LAB is manufactured.
