Kerala High Court Advocate Association Vs Assistant Commissioner (Kerala High Court) Kerala HC issued notice to Govt. in writ challenging GST on goods and services provided by Association to its members Kerala High Court Advocates’ Association (Petitioner) filed a Writ Petition challenging GST on goods and services provided by the Petitioner to its own members. […]
Writ Petitions having alternative remedy not to be entertained if no violation of fundamental rights, excess jurisdiction/ delegation In The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax and Others v. M/s Commercial Steel Limited [Civil Appeal No 5121 of 2021 dated September 03, 2021], the current appeal has been filed against the Judgment dated March 04, 2020 […]
The issue relate to demand of service tax on remittance towards services on which service tax was payable as per the Import Rules and has been paid by the Appellant but it has not been accepted by the Department.
CESTAT, Ahmedabad held that the Product Recall Policy expenses is born for the purpose of security of the goods and for this reason the service falls under the definition of input services and is therefore, eligible for CENVAT Credit.
Sinochem India Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) In Sinochem India Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (L) No. 13894 of 2021] and in Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. The Union of India & Ors, [Writ Petition (L) No. 8163 of 2021] involve a common […]
Shriraj Investment and Finance Ltd. & Ors. Vs Union of India & Anr. (Delhi High Court) Delhi HC: Where the case has been admitted in NCLT, all the contentions including power to initiate such proceeding should be raised before and concluded by NCLT only Shriraj Investment Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner No. 1) and Casper Consumer Electronics […]
Appellant contended that such contribution is made for empowerment of women however, the CIT(A) in its order observed that although the expenditure was for a noble cause, it has no nexus contribution made and the income generated for the business of the Appellant company under Section 37 of the IT Ac
Jayaseelan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Shri Jayaseelan (the Appellant) has filed the current appeal being aggrieved against the order dated March 5, 2018 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (the CIT(A)) for the assessment year 2014-15 wherein the claim of the Appellant claiming benefit under section 54 of the Income Tax Act,1961 […]
Ramaiah Harish Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) It was held that an independent building can have a number of residential units and it will not lose the character of one residential house.
Appellant, during AY 2012-2013, paid a huge amount towards provision of toilet facilities in Government Schools where the children of employees of the Appellant were studying. While filing the returns for that year, the Appellant claimed the same amount as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenses and submitted that by incurring the expenses, its productivity improves and the loyalty of its employees are also ensured.
