AAR held that no GST shall be levied on services provided to educational institution for conducting entrance examination.
AAR held that assessee providing marketing services to a foreign company and acting as a conduit between a foreign company and its Indian customers to be considered as intermediary.
HC set aside the demand order passed in Form DRC-07 by the Revenue Department, on the grounds of non-speaking order. All the relevant aspects of the matter were not considered and were not reflected in order.
CESTAT held that, escalated value received under a contract for service of construction of road during GST regime, shall be added to the original contract value and the actual transaction value should be considered for payment of tax.
Ensure smooth GST compliance for FY 2021-22 with these important activities. Reconcile ITC, follow up with suppliers, and more for a seamless transition.
HC held that the service provided by the petitioner i.e., leasing out residential premises as hostel to students and working professionals is covered under Entry 13 of Notification No.9/2017 dated 28.09.2017 namely ‘Services by way of renting of residential dwelling for use as residence’ issued under the Act. The petitioner is held entitled to benefit of exemption notification.
CESTAT Held that, no service tax is payable on notice pay in lieu of sudden termination, as it does not give rise to the rendition of service either by the employer or the employee, and compensation for failure under a contract cannot be consideration for service. Further held that such contract cannot be termed as declared service.
Subhash Light House Vs Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) ST not leviable on supply of gensets for short period as it is amounts to deemed sales The CESTAT, New Delhi in M/S Subhash Light House v. Commissioner, Central Goods & Service [Service Tax Appeal No. 50176 of 2019 Tax, Audit-II dated February […]
HC quashed ’SCN’ issued by Revenue Department suspending GST registration of the assessee and directed to reissue a fresh SCN with all the relevant facts and reasons within a week’s time regarding. Further, directed the Revenue Department to restore the assessee’s GST registration and issue a practice direction so that in future, if any SCN for cancellation of GST registration is issued, the same is not bereft of any material particulars or reasons.
HC held that the Revenue Department cannot issue assessment orders without giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard and is against the principles of natural justice. Further, remanded back the matter to be heard as a fresh case.
