White Cliffs Hair Studio Private Ltd Vs Additional Commissioner (Madras High Court) No Service Tax to be levied on fitment and preparation of scalp to make Wig The Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the matter of M/s White Cliffs Hair Studio Private Ltd v. Additional Commissioner, Office of the Principal Commissioner of CGST and […]
HC set aside order to attach the bank account of assessee for more than one year and held that as per section 83 of CGST Act the prescribed time limit for provisional attachment is one year
HC held that Service Tax cannot be levied on affiliation fee and fees collected for other incidental activities by universities for providing educational services.
HC sets aside order cancelling GST registration, and held that SC suo moto extension of limitation period is applicable for filing appeal against cancellation
Whether Service Tax could be levied on Composite Works Contracts prior to the introduction of the Finance Act, by which the Finance Act, 1994 amended to introduce Section 65(105)(zzzza) pertaining to Works Contract Service.?
HC held that when assessee adjusted excise duty payable on closing stock of finished goods with available input credit and paid remaining amount after said adjustment, would tantamount to actual payment and no disallowance could be made under section 43B of Income-tax Act, 1961
AAR held that, Interactive Flat Panel Screens used only for data processing purposes will attract GST rate of 18% and in case the same provides any additional function, GST at 28% will be attracted.
Magistrate without examining any witnesses cannot take cognizance on complaint lodged by complainant and issue summons to accused.
SC in case of Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. allowed ‘any aggrieved registered assessee’ to file a form seeking Transitional credit or revision thereof
CESTAT held that there shall be consonance between allegation levelled by Revenue and the records presented against the taxpayer. Further held that the allegation cannot be justified in absence of any admission from the assessee against the alleged clandestine transaction. Moreover, third party records and statement by Director of the Company cannot be used against the assessee for non-joinder of the parties.
