Paschimanchal Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) AO noticed that assessee had made assessment of electricity duty of Rs. 5,52,98,00,000/- of which Rs. 3,44,22,00,000/- was adjusted from the subsidy and the balance amount of Rs.2,08,76,00,000/-was not paid by the assessee before filing the return of income. Assessee was asked to justify as to […]
‘Guidance Note on Applicability of AS 25 to Interim Financial Results’ which was issued in the year 2008 and ‘Guidance Note on Measurement of Income Tax Expense for Interim Financial Reporting in the context of AS 25’ which was issued in the year 2006 to issue as ‘Guidance Note on Applicability of AS 25 and Measurement of Income Tax Expense for Interim Financial Reporting’.
SEBI Circular No. CFD/DIL3/CIR/2017/21 dated March 10, 2017 has laid down the framework for Schemes of Arrangement by listed entities and relaxation under Rule 19(7) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957.
On the basis of specific intelligence, under the direction of the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Bhubaneswar Shri Debashish Sahu, investigation was initiated and relevant business premises of Exporter and Customs House Agent at various places was searched.
Himalaya Drug Company Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) We noticed that the assessee has exported finished goods to its AEs located in various Countries and the AEs have only marketed the goods. Since the finished goods exported by the assessee are drugs and beauty care items, the assessee was required to comply with the requirement of […]
As a result of recent havoc created by heavy rainfall and floods there are reports of loss of human lives and loss of belongings in the affected Districts of primarily the states of Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra and Karnataka. In order to extend every possible facilitation for quick and timely settlement of life insurance claims, you are advised to take the following actions immediately in all the states affected due to this disaster.
Jalarani Jagruti Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) It is not in dispute that receipts in question have direct nexus with the business of the assessee and represent cash receipts against sale of shops and flats. is also not in dispute that the assessee follows project completion method of revenue recognition and that project […]
ITO Vs Newtech (India) Developers (ITAT Mumbai) What was to be received by the assessee was from a joint venture, in which assessee itself was a participant, but, under the said arrangement, it was to be entirely funded by Shivalik Ventures Pvt Ltd. The essence of the arrangement was the performance of obligations by the […]
The Scheme would be applicable to all loans sanctioned under GECL during the period from the date of issue of these guidelines by NCGTC to 30.11.2020, or till an amount of Rs 3,00,000 crore is sanctioned under the GECL, whichever is earlier.
Ramchan Krunakaran Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Bombay High Court) In Nikesh Tarachand Shah Vs. Union of India, 2018(11) SCC 1, the Apex Court has reiterated the principle concerning grant of bail being the rule and refusal being exception and while dealing with Section 45 of the PMLA Act which imposes twin stringent condition for offences […]
