The applicant in its application for rectifying an Order No. 22 for Advance Ruling issued by Authority for Advance Ruling on 25.01.2019, submitted that in online application, name of the company and GSTIN were correctly filled but while submitting the hard copy of application form GST ARA-01 name of the company and GSTIN were in advertently submitted Rudhrabhishek Enterprises Limited and GSTIN 09AAGCR1735A1ZP instead of Rudrabhishek Enterprises Limited and GSTIN 09AAACR0707L2ZD.
In re R. R. Enterprises (GST AAR Haryana) Whether the provision of services (Manpower Supply) of tube well operator for operation of tube well and booster of drinking and irrigation water supply in various villages covered under Panchayat are exempt or taxable? It is case of the applicant that services supplied by it are exempted, […]
Before taking up the application for consideration, the Applicant vide letter No. BAL/GST-Corres/134 dated 05.02.2019 informed in writing to withdraw the application filed under Section 97 of CGST/OGST Act,2017. Since, the Applicant is no more desirous of the ruling sought for the application for withdrawal is hereby allowed.
In re Autometers AlliancgoodsPvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) From the characteristic of the Vigilance Control Device (VCD), Diagnostic Terminal (DT) & Master Controller System (MCS), chapter Notes, Classification Rules and above discussion, they all fall in Code 8530 10 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, […]
In re Rudhrabhishek Enterprises Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Whether the Project Development Service (i.e. Detailed project Report Service) and Project Management Consultancy Services (PMCS) provided by the applicant to recipient under the contract of SUDA; and the Project Management Consultancy Services (PMC) under the Contract for PMAY would qualify as an activity in relation […]
In re General Mills India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) In respect of point (i) to the grounds of Appeal, we hold that the use of the name of the Applicant i.e. ‘General Mills India Pvt. Ltd on the packaging for supply of Products by the Applicant solely for the limited purpose of complying […]
In re SPFL Securities Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Question – Taxability on delayed payment charges on reimbursement of amount by client to applicant, where client failed to pay amount paid to stock Exchanges for purchase of securities with T+1 (Trading day plus one day) under SEBI regulation norms and deducted by Stock Exchange from […]
In re Ashiana Housing Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Q. Whether the amount of statutory charges, i.e. External Development Charges and Infrastructural Development Charges, recovered by the Applicant from buyers and paid further to respective government authorities will form part of value of taxable supplies being made by the Applicant? Ans: The clause (a) of sub-section […]
In re Yum Restraunts (India) Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Q1. Whether the services provided under technology license agreement entered into by the applicant will qualify under service accounting code 9973 which provides for ‘temporary or permanent transfer or permitting the use of enjoyment of intellectual Property (IP) right in respect of goods other than […]
It is clarified that the benefit of nil rate is provided to only those support services to, agriculture which are specifically mentioned at Sr. No. 24 of the said notification. It does not cover the services of transport of agriculture produce and therefore the applicable SAC on such services shall be 9967 irrespective of the service being performed in relation to agricultural produce or any other goods.
