Delhi High Court held that writ seeking direction to Central Bureau of Investigation [CBI]; Enforcement Directorate [ED] and Serious Fraud Investigation Office [SFIO] to investigate in gigantic Westland Trade Pvt. Ltd. franchisee scam is dismissed.
CESTAT Chennai held that imported LED Monitors Tiles are classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 84285200 and hence eligible for exemption in terms of Notification No. 24/2005-Cus dated 01/03/2005. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
NCLT Kochi held that delay in filing bankruptcy application u/s. 123 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 condoned considering that compliance with Section 121(2) should be considered directory in nature. Accordingly, present appeal is allowed.
ITAT Mumbai held that section 50 does not convert a long-term capital asset to a short-term capital asset, then the rate of tax is applicable for the transfer of a long-term capital asset has to be in accordance with section 112. The deeming fiction of section 50 cannot be imported under section 112.
Gujarat High Court held that reimbursement of the service of the cost of repairing and restoration of the roads to AMC cannot be considered as a supply of service by the AMC so as to fasten the liability of the GST on reverse charge basis.
NCLAT Delhi held that liquidator duly allowed to remove all the movable assets of the Corporate Debtor lying at the leased premises since appellant/lessor never raised any objection regarding ownership of assets either during CIRP or during liquidation proceeding.
Bombay High Court held that the benefit of concessional rate on High Speed Diesel [HSD] against Form ‘C’ is not entitled since the usage of HSD is beyond specified purpose i.e. used beyond direct mining operations. Accordingly, writ disposed of.
Jammu Kashmir High Court held that licensing requirement under Jammu and Kashmir Brick Kiln (Regulation) Act, 2010 read with rule 3 of the Jammu and Kashmir Brick Kiln (Regulation) Rules, 2017 applies to both manufacturer and dealers. Further, the licensing requirement doesn’t violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
Gujarat High Court held that PAN jurisdiction in ITBA [Income Tax Business Application] portal is of no consequence in absence of order passed under section 127 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, notice and order thereof is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Delhi held that Transfer Pricing Adjustment made by the revenue on account of administrative support services segment deserves to be deleted since services rendered are in nature of intra group services and not stewardship activity.
