Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Milind Amrut Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Milind Amrut Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Claim of Acting as Mere “Conduit” through M-Pesa Rejected – ₹32.22 Lakh Cash Deposit Treated as Unexplained & Appeal Dismissed Assessee’s appeal before ITAT challenged the NFAC order dated 04-07-2025 confirming addition of ₹32,22,775/- u/s 69A as unexplained cash deposit. When the case was called, no one appeared for the Assessee, & the adjournment request received through email contained no valid reason. Tribunal held that adjournment is not a matter of right & found the request casual & dilatory, hence rejected it. On merits...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930