Case Law Details
Case Name : Milind Amrut Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Milind Amrut Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Claim of Acting as Mere “Conduit” through M-Pesa Rejected – ₹32.22 Lakh Cash Deposit Treated as Unexplained & Appeal Dismissed
Assessee’s appeal before ITAT challenged the NFAC order dated 04-07-2025 confirming addition of ₹32,22,775/- u/s 69A as unexplained cash deposit. When the case was called, no one appeared for the Assessee, & the adjournment request received through email contained no valid reason. Tribunal held that adjournment is not a matter of right & found the request casual & dilatory, hence rejected it.
On merits...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

