Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Late Jagdish Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Late Jagdish Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) You’re Still Taxed After You’re Gone- But Your Heir Only Pays What’s in the Cupboard –Penalty Survives After Death but Legal Heir Liable Only to Extent of Inherited Assets – Section 159 Covers Tax & Penalty – Death Doesn’t Abate Penalty Proceedings- ITAT Jaipur The late assessee, Shri Jagdish, was assessed for AY 2007-08, in which the AO made two additions: ₹ 3,80,000 as unexplained cash deposits, & ₹ 14,62,758 as Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) u/s 50C on sale of land. A penalty of ₹ 3,96,929 u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for â...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031