Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Jatin Madani (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Jatin Madani (ITAT Delhi) Post-Search Statements is not Incriminating Material-153C Route Ignored, 153A Fails – No Incriminating Material, No Addition-Third-Party Statements Not Enough Revenue appealed against CIT(A)’s order deleting additions aggregating over ₹11 crore made in assessment u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) pursuant to search in Ashish Begwani group. AO had treated Assessee as beneficiary of accommodation entries & made additions on account of (i) commission income from cash transportation & entry facilitation, (ii) unexplained investment of ₹10 lakh, & (iii...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930