Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Baiju Lekshmanan Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Baiju Lekshmanan Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin) Unexplained Cash Deposits u/s 69A Upheld: Cochin ITAT Rejects Post-Dated Evidence in Absence of Proof The case of the assessee was selected for re-assessment u/s 147   based on information that the assessee had made cash deposits totaling Rs.10587899/- in his bank a/c  . AO observed that the assessee has not filed return of income   u/s 139 despite having taxable income.  In response to notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1)   assessee filed a return of income .  During scrutiny, the assessee failed to provide any explanation regarding the transaction to...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Agricultural Land Also Covered by Section 56(2)(x) – ITAT Upholds Addition Based on DVO Valuation WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031