Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Baiju Lekshmanan Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Baiju Lekshmanan Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin) Unexplained Cash Deposits u/s 69A Upheld: Cochin ITAT Rejects Post-Dated Evidence in Absence of Proof The case of the assessee was selected for re-assessment u/s 147   based on information that the assessee had made cash deposits totaling Rs.10587899/- in his bank a/c  . AO observed that the assessee has not filed return of income   u/s 139 despite having taxable income.  In response to notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1)   assessee filed a return of income .  During scrutiny, the assessee failed to provide any explanation regarding the transaction to...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031