Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Mohammed Meeran Shahul Hameed (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CIT Vs Mohammed Meeran Shahul Hameed (Supreme Court)  On a fair reading of sub­section (2) of Section 263 it can be seen that as mandated by sub­section (2) of Section 263 no order under Section 263 of the Act shall be ‘made’ after the expiry of two years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed. Therefore the word used is ‘made’ and not the order ‘received’ by the assessee. Even the word ‘dispatch’ is not mentioned in Section 263 (2). Therefore, once it is established that the order under Section 2...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930