Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT Vs Mohammed Meeran Shahul Hameed (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CIT Vs Mohammed Meeran Shahul Hameed (Supreme Court)
On a fair reading of subsection (2) of Section 263 it can be seen that as mandated by subsection (2) of Section 263 no order under Section 263 of the Act shall be ‘made’ after the expiry of two years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed. Therefore the word used is ‘made’ and not the order ‘received’ by the assessee. Even the word ‘dispatch’ is not mentioned in Section 263 (2). Therefore, once it is established that the order under Section 2...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

