Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Calicut Commissionerate Vs M/s. Orion Battery (CESTAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The ground canvassed in the Show-cause notice for rejection of the claim was that the claim was filed under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as existed prior to Cenvat Credit (Third Amendment) Rules, 2012. But I find that the amending Rule itself had a provision to consider claims under the erstwhile Rule within a year from the amendment. But the refund claim was rejected vide the impugned order on the ground that the claimant is ineligible for refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules as he had claimed drawback under the Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995. The ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031