Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Calicut Commissionerate Vs M/s. Orion Battery (CESTAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The ground canvassed in the Show-cause notice for rejection of the claim was that the claim was filed under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as existed prior to Cenvat Credit (Third Amendment) Rules, 2012. But I find that the amending Rule itself had a provision to consider claims under the erstwhile Rule within a year from the amendment. But the refund claim was rejected vide the impugned order on the ground

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Breach of Natural Justice: Madras HC Sets Aside GST Demand & Bank Attachment Orders Allahabad HC Sets Aside GST Assessment Orders for Non-Disclosure of SIB Report Demand Exceeds Notice: Uttarakhand HC Quashed GST Order Madras HC Dismisses GST Writ Petitions Filed Beyond Appeal Period Supreme Court Mandates Reasoned Consumer Forum Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930