Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Samta Khinda Vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah UNSIGNED AND UNDATED PAPER FOUND DURING THE SEARCH WITH NO CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE. NOT RECORDING OF THE SATISFACTION BY AO: WHETHER ADDITIONS TO THE INCOME CAN BE MADE? Recently, in Samta Khinda vs. ACIT [I.T.A. Nos. 336/DEL/2012 and 5515/DEL/2013, decided on 29/11/2016], some of the grounds raised were that the CIT (A) had grossly erred in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the addition of Rs. 96 lacs in the hands of the assessee as unaccounted income from undisclosed sources in terms of Sec 69/698/69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961(herein referred to as ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. RAMESH SANTRAM WAGHMARE says:

    Very nice decision, each A.O. requires to learn while dealing with impounded or seized or incriminating document in any action under Income Tax Act and Rules.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031