This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Once initial burden in terms of section 68 of IT Act, 1961 is discharged by assessee, onus shifts to Department to prove that amount credited in books of accounts represents undisclosed income of assessee
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs. Kishori Lal Construction Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DECIDED BY: HIGH COURT OF DELHI, IN THE CASE OF: CIT Vs. Kishori Lal Construction Ltd., APPEAL NO: ITA 783/2007, DECIDED ON December 23, 2009
JUDGMENT
A.K. SIKRI, J.
1. By the impugned order, learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has affirmed the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) [CIT(A)] deleting the addition of Rs.49,41,030/- made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as Act?) on account of unexplained cash credit. This amount was received by the assessee from one M/s Yadav and Company and according to...
