Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jiten Basantilal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jiten Basantilal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Third-Party ERP Entries Alone Cannot Justify Section 69 Addition: ITAT Deletes Jewellery Purchase Addition The Ahmedabad ITAT deleted addition of ₹16.05 lakh made under Section 69 against a jewellery trader, holding that uncorroborated entries found in third-party ERP software during search on another group cannot, by themselves, establish unexplained investments or purchases. The assessee, proprietor of M/s Mahalaxmi Jewellers, had filed return under presumptive taxation scheme of Section 44AD. During search proceedings on the Tirth Gold group, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031