Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : E-Mox Device Company Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
E-Mox Device Company Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) In the case of E-Mox Device Company Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, allowed the appeal filed by E-Mox Device Company and held that valuation of blow moulded HDPE plastic bottle caps manufactured on job work basis could not be determined under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules by adopting 110% of the cost of production. The appellant was engaged in manufacturing HDPE plastic bottle caps for Marico Limited on job work ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031